Sinja Kraus vs Berfu Cengiz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 11:34 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Kraus vs B. Cengiz

AUT
2
Win
Played
0
Win

TUR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kraus 2 - 0 Cengiz
They have played 5 sets in total, with Sinja Kraus winning 4 and Berfu Cengiz winning 1. The last match between Sinja Kraus and Berfu Cengiz was at the European Open - Hamburg, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Sinja Kraus getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kraus | 2 |
| Cengiz | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) European Open - Hamburg(07-15-25)
(SF) W50 Meerbusch(08-31-24)
S. Kraus vs B. Cengiz H2H Profile
S. Kraus vs B. Cengiz Match Preview:
- Second serve strength: In the recent six-month period, Kraus outperforms Cengiz by winning 38.48% of their second serve points compared to Cengiz's 34.78%. Does this give Kraus an edge? It could be significant, as second serve performance correlates highly with match predictions.
- Return game analysis: Cengiz excels at returning second serves, claiming 58.23% of points, whereas Kraus manages 49.17%. On first serve returns, Kraus slightly leads with 34.14% to Cengiz's 31.88%.
- Breakpoint resilience: Kraus has a slight advantage, saving 47.8% of breakpoints compared to Cengiz's 42.11%, which is notable for in-game betting insights.
- Match winning trends: Over the past year, Kraus has a superior win record at 65.43%, whereas Cengiz has won half of their matches at 50%.
- Surface expertise: Both favor clay, with Kraus having a slight edge with a 66% win rate over Cengiz's 65%. However, Cengiz struggles on grass (0%), while Kraus finds hard courts challenging (42%).
- Event participation comparison: Kraus has a stronger performance in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, winning 66.67% compared to Cengiz's 52%.
- Direct head-to-head results: Kraus leads 1-0 in their encounters, having won the previous two sets against Cengiz decisively.
- User under pressure: Neither player has faced a tie-break against each other, but Kraus's better breakpoint conversion rate of 48.32% versus Cengiz's 38.71% might be telling.
- Opponent strength: Kraus has faced higher-ranked opponents on average, with a ranking of 281.22 compared to Cengiz's 348.85.
- Deciding set proficiency: Should the match extend to a deciding set, Kraus holds a 64% win rate over the past year, while Cengiz sits at 43%.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
Kraus demonstrates slightly better second serve performance than Cengiz, which is often indicative of overall match success.
While Cengiz has an advantage in returning second serves and a competitive clay court record, Kraus's better breakpoint conversion and overall win rate give them an edge.
The players' head-to-head history, combined with Kraus's superior performance in high-stakes situations, supports a prediction in favor of Kraus.
Considering Kraus's recent form and success in similar tournaments, they are the most likely candidate to secure a win in the upcoming match.
Sinja Kraus vs Berfu Cengiz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Kraus vs B. Cengiz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 18 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:32:57 | Average Match Time | 1:32:57 |
| 60% (85/142) | 1st Serve % | 63% (97/153) |
| 69% (59/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (55/97) |
| 54% (31/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (22/56) |
| 48% (11/23) | Break Pts Won % | 46% (6/13) |
| 50% (76/153) | Return Points Win % | 37% (52/142) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Kraus Recent Matches Played
B. Cengiz Recent Matches Played

S. Kraus vs B. Cengiz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.14% (264/175) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.19% (270/194) |
| 57.10% (575/432) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.07% (600/470) |
| 53.34% (4881/4270) | Games Win/Loss | 52.48% (5071/4592) |
| 41.27% (26/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.74% (77/69) |
| 67.13% (194/95) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.92% (124/70) |
| 50.62% (41/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.10% (69/54) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 631 | Aces Total | 476 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1302 | Total Double Faults | 1459 |
| 1:30:36 | Average Match Time | 1:21:27 |
| 438.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 521.91 |
| 59% (16311/27739) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17219/27973) |
| 61% (10003/16311) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (10232/17219) |
| 45% (5146/11428) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4847/10755) |
| 49% (1849/3760) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1898/3843) |
| 48% (13330/27835) | Return Points Win % | 48% (13573/28521) |
| 31.25% (5/11) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 45.45% (10/12) | Main Tour W/L | 35.29% (6/11) |
| 62.54% (182/109) | Challenger W/L | 55.65% (187/149) |
| 61.29% (57/36) | Futures W/L | 71.84% (74/29) |
| 60% (261/435) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (263/455) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (43/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (44/86) |
| 63% (82/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (81/145) |
| 88% (247/217) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (251/214) |
| 12% (247/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (251/36) |
| 24% (192/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (213/54) |